What would happen if suddenly, magically, men could menstruate and women could not? The answer is clear: menstruation would become an enviable, boast-worthy, masculine event. Men would brag about how long and how much.
Boys would mark the onset of menses, that longed-for proof of manhood, with religious ritual and stag parties.
Congress would fund a National Institute of Dysmenorrhea to help stamp out monthly discomforts.
Sanitary supplies would be federally funded and free. (Of course, some men would still pay for the prestige of commercial brands such as John Wayne Tampons, Muhammad Ali's Rope-a-dope Pads, Joe Namath Jock Shields - "For Those Light Bachelor Days," and Robert "Baretta" Blake Maxi-Pads.)
Military men, right-wing politicians, and religious fundamentalists would cite menstruation (MENstruation) as proof that only men could serve in the army (you have to give *lo** to take *lo**), occupy political office (can women be aggressive without that steadfast cycle governed by the planet Mars?), be priests and ministers (how could a woman give her *lo** for our sins), or rabbis (without the monthly loss of impurities, women remain unclean).
Male radicals, left-wing politicians, and mystics, however, would insist that women are equal, just different; and that any woman could enter their ranks if only she were willing to self-inflict a major wound every month (you MUST give *lo** for the revolution), recognize the preeminence of menstrual issues, or subordinate her selfness to all men in their Cycle of Enlightenment.
Street guys would brag (I'm a three-pad man) or answer praise from a buddy (Man, you are lookin' good) by high-fiving and saying, "Yeah, man, I'm on the rag!" TV shows would treat the subject at length. (Happy Days: Richie and Potsie try to convince Fonzie that he is still "The Fonz," though he has missed two periods in a row.) So would newspapers. (SHARK SCARE THREATENS MENSTRUATING MEN. JUDGE CITES MONTHLY STRESS IN PARDONING RAPIST.) And movies. (Newman and Redford in "*lo** Brothers!")
Men would try to convince women that intercourse was more pleasurable at "that time of the month." Lesbians would be said to fear *lo** and therefore life itself ----though probably only because they needed a good menstruating man.
Of course, male intellectuals would offer the most moral and logical arguments. How could a woman master any discipline that demanded a sense of time, space, mathematics, or measurement, for instance, without that in-built gift for measuring the cycles of the moon and planets -- and thus for measuring anything at all? In the rarefied fields of philosophy and religion, could women compensate for missing the rhythm of the universe? Or for their lack of symbolic death-and-resurrection every month?
Liberal males in every field would be kind to women: the fact that "these people" have no gift for measuring life or connecting the universe, the liberals would explain, that should be punishment enough.
-- Edited by pengo at 14:31, 2008-04-02
DJ O.P. said
13:26 04/02 2008
mi naw read di post but mi waan kno is weh RD gone caw you eva a mek dem sex post
pengo said
13:32 04/02 2008
none a dat fi men. lol
ANDREDESIGNZ said
14:08 04/02 2008
WTF MENSTRUATING MEN
up2 said
14:35 04/02 2008
we don't play dat
ssugarlipss (Administrator) said
16:07 04/02 2008
nuh man it doesnt sound good lol... dis and childbirth a man wouldnt handle lol
-- Edited by ssugarlipss at 17:08, 2008-04-02
Crazypickney said
13:26 04/09 2008
whey di hell. makes me wanna vomit
Caramel_Delite said
13:26 04/09 2008
LOL OP
kalongi said
13:27 04/09 2008
boooooooooooooooooooo
lyndo said
13:30 04/09 2008
noooooooooooooooooooooooo...we will not have it...thank god it won't be that way so u females can only jus sit & imagine these things wen it their time of da month
BADANG!!!
sting said
00:05 04/27 2008
noooooooooooooooooooooooooo mi not even read it
none a dat round here
Boys would mark the onset of menses, that longed-for proof of manhood, with religious ritual and stag parties.
Congress would fund a National Institute of Dysmenorrhea to help stamp out monthly discomforts.
Sanitary supplies would be federally funded and free. (Of course, some men would still pay for the prestige of commercial brands such as John Wayne Tampons, Muhammad Ali's Rope-a-dope Pads, Joe Namath Jock Shields - "For Those Light Bachelor Days," and Robert "Baretta" Blake Maxi-Pads.)
Military men, right-wing politicians, and religious fundamentalists would cite menstruation (MENstruation) as proof that only men could serve in the army (you have to give *lo** to take *lo**), occupy political office (can women be aggressive without that steadfast cycle governed by the planet Mars?), be priests and ministers (how could a woman give her *lo** for our sins), or rabbis (without the monthly loss of impurities, women remain unclean).
Male radicals, left-wing politicians, and mystics, however, would insist that women are equal, just different; and that any woman could enter their ranks if only she were willing to self-inflict a major wound every month (you MUST give *lo** for the revolution), recognize the preeminence of menstrual issues, or subordinate her selfness to all men in their Cycle of Enlightenment.
Street guys would brag (I'm a three-pad man) or answer praise from a buddy (Man, you are lookin' good) by high-fiving and saying, "Yeah, man, I'm on the rag!" TV shows would treat the subject at length. (Happy Days: Richie and Potsie try to convince Fonzie that he is still "The Fonz," though he has missed two periods in a row.) So would newspapers. (SHARK SCARE THREATENS MENSTRUATING MEN. JUDGE CITES MONTHLY STRESS IN PARDONING RAPIST.) And movies. (Newman and Redford in "*lo** Brothers!")
Men would try to convince women that intercourse was more pleasurable at "that time of the month." Lesbians would be said to fear *lo** and therefore life itself ----though probably only because they needed a good menstruating man.
Of course, male intellectuals would offer the most moral and logical arguments. How could a woman master any discipline that demanded a sense of time, space, mathematics, or measurement, for instance, without that in-built gift for measuring the cycles of the moon and planets -- and thus for measuring anything at all? In the rarefied fields of philosophy and religion, could women compensate for missing the rhythm of the universe? Or for their lack of symbolic death-and-resurrection every month?
Liberal males in every field would be kind to women: the fact that "these people" have no gift for measuring life or connecting the universe, the liberals would explain, that should be punishment enough.
-- Edited by pengo at 14:31, 2008-04-02
-- Edited by ssugarlipss at 17:08, 2008-04-02