my gosh where have i been a dat a gwaan

i remember these arguements

lol

boy oh boy

stain a wah a gwaan in yah.........lol

hmm

wooh dis is MHAAD THING PAN ZONE SETTLE IT OUT IN A CLASH STING,DANE VS. LYNDO BOI & STAINZ lol mhaaddd thing lmao!!! @ admin

sting and fishydane

lol

Hiss Teeth... If i was to express my views on this, a whole new arguement woulda start. People need to act more mature...

lord this still ago lol............................. stain still the most wanted man on the zoneeeeeee

Is only CP fi want Stain, lol.

lol

lol a that fi happen to the one stain

-- Edited by ANDRE_DESIGNZ at 06:32, 2008-05-14

ADMIN wrote:

---

After watching this topic to see the response and the behaviours of the members, the results are

In the case of "OUTANDBADINT" and "STAINLESS"

Outandbadint was trying to get his post ranks up, and as such decided to post in several outdated topics such as "Hits Riddim" saying a mere "oldies rock trust me". Also in several "Members Photo" topics saying "Members Big Up" and mostly in "Disscussion" topics, saying a simple, "yes" "no" "both". It is with this that Stainless and others such as RiddimQueen, JamaicaBwoy, DJ Moet, to name a few, inquired and voiced their displeasure in the situation. Nonetheless, the 208 idle posts have been removed and I am asking Outandbadint to refrain from doing such actions again.

The other issue, stemmed from the fact that Outandbadint and his lady friend were using the same account, but wasnt to the knowledge of anyone. Thus when one is viewing certain posts, the response was confusing as to why a "male" is supposedly responding like a "female" It was this confusion that brought up speculation that Outandbadint was probably gay. Nonetheless, without stopping to think, Stainless and other members started to call Outandbadnint "battyman" and "fish". In the end, the matter was cleared up when OutandBadint made them aware of the fact that his lady friend was using his account also.

Therefore, based on these findings, OutandBadint and Stainless are both guilty as to the manner in which they dealt with the situation. Both parties have moved on from this incident, and I do hope the rest of mediazoneja will do the same.


-- Edited by ADMIN at 14:02, 2008-05-09

---

ADMIN wrote:

---

In the case of "STING" and the rest of mediazoneja.com and "STAINLESS"

There was a topic started by Sting about the age level on the site. Other members were voicing their opinions on the topic that stemmed from an incident where a certain member age was discovered. Stainless proceeded to voice his opinion on the matter, simply saying its rubbish to discuss this due to the fact that we cannot know the rightful age of a person. Stainless decided to place the topic in the "Rubbish Bin" and it was with this action that everyone started to voice their displeasure on the movement.

This is a very tricky situation as this topic, has sprung many arguments before. However, it was not in a discussion topic, but rather a live display in the chatbox, thus evidence of this mishap was not stored and recorded. Stainless, being a senior member and having knowledge of the previous incidents, acted within that manner. However, I made the decision to delete the topic based on the arguments that had risen over that same topic.I will not disclose those horrible incidents that took place, as those members know themselves and have moved on. Some are still with us and active, some are still here but inactive, while others have completely disappeared.

Nonetheless, it is a very sensitive topic that evidently in the past has presented displeasing outcomes. Everyone feels that they are mature enough to be on the site. Someone being 20 may think they are mature enough to be on the site, while someone who is 40 will consider them to be a child. And I have come to realise that some people are greatly affected when being called a "kid" or "young".

The results, the topic was started over a particular member age, which was offensive to the person. If it was a case where the topic was started out of mere innocence, then it would hide under the radar, and removed without complications. In the end, I can see where everyone was angry about the movement of the topic without proper explanation. I have provided the explanation and sincerely hope that you all will now realise the reason for Stainless actions and able to move on from here. It is unfortunate however that one member was lost during this process and several others became inactive, but communication is the key and if there is any issue, please send me a PM, so that the matter can be solved amicably.

THANK YOU ALL

---

WOW admin, well put...dats y admin is admin it sort out

ANDRE_DESIGNZ wrote:

---

lol a that fi happen to the one stain

-- Edited by ANDRE_DESIGNZ at 06:32, 2008-05-14

---

soun like u wah war it out wid him 2?

whappen wid freedom of speech?? ..... or we gotta pay fi dat too???.... stain jus defendin himself wen di ediats start

lol

mad!