none a dem better u buy a no know mp3 player it do the same thing and way cheaper
Dant'ae said
08:36 08/08 2008
i think its the zune.......but ipod it more slick...so i would buy dat
shardo said
08:43 08/08 2008
miggskills wrote:
none a dem better u buy a no know mp3 player it do the same thing and way cheaper
haha... yuh cheap bad
shardo said
08:46 08/08 2008
im still sayin both, becuz one has wat tha other doesn't have... [Zune has better qualities than ipod does, Ipod has better organization nd functions Zune dont have]
Shem1 said
09:48 08/08 2008
shardo wrote:
im still sayin both, becuz one has wat tha other doesn't have... [Zune has better qualities than ipod does, Ipod has better organization nd functions Zune dont have]
good point
DJ Miggs said
09:49 08/08 2008
shardo wrote:
miggskills wrote:
none a dem better u buy a no know mp3 player it do the same thing and way cheaper
haha... yuh cheap bad
is not cheapis being a rationale consumer
AL said
01:06 08/16 2008
me have a zune...ipod a a googs
powa said
01:08 08/16 2008
zune
JaydsTbalist said
02:08 08/16 2008
I-Phone
skendon said
03:04 08/26 2008
unuh b more specific ya man. cause unuh obviously caa b comparing di zune to a 3g or even 5g pad. u caa compare it to a classic ida. suh is muss di touch.and di touch outclass di zune. only ting di zune wi ave over di touch is di wa?wireless zune to zune pic sharing?and audio sharing?bluetoot erase dat.cause i sure a nigga nah go share a song wen dem can jus lis10 from di one ting.touch have bigger screen,higher resolution,can play more audio formats and vid formats,longer battery life,weigh less.need i continue?wuss wen it jailbreaked!heaven u gone.HEAVEN MI SEH.zune.....is for people who cant afford a touch.since its a bit cheaper